The Strategic and Tactical Value of Commodity Futures
Read the paperopens doi.org in a new tab
What they found
A more skeptical companion to Gorton and Rouwenhorst. Erb and Harvey argue that the average individual commodity futures contract has had a risk premium close to zero and that the attractive returns of commodity indices came largely from 'diversification return', the rebalancing bonus that comes from regularly rebalancing among volatile, low-correlated assets. They show that the term structure of an individual commodity (backwardation or contango) strongly predicts its return, that momentum works in commodities, and that a long-short strategy based on roll yield beats a long-only index.
See it drawn
Original diagrams for the ideas on this page. Illustrative, not real market data.
What you can use
- The average single commodity has earned roughly nothing; the returns of commodity indices came from rebalancing and from the contracts that were in backwardation.
- Whether a commodity's futures curve is in backwardation or contango has been the single most useful predictor of its return.
- A long-only commodity index is a poor way to capture the premium; long backwardated, short contangoed is the research-supported version.
Caveats
Practitioner-focused with a sample ending 2004. The diversification-return argument has been debated (Willenbrock 2011). A free SSRN version exists.
Tags: commodities, futures, roll-yield, backwardation
Summaries are our own reading of the paper, not the authors' words. Educational only, not advice. Discuss it in Book Club.