Should Retail Investors' Leverage Be Limited?
Read the paperopens doi.org in a new tab
What they found
In 2010 the CFTC cut the maximum leverage U.S. retail forex traders could use from 100:1 (or higher) to 50:1. Using account-level data from a social trading platform covering U.S. and non-U.S. traders, the authors compared the affected traders with unaffected ones. The leverage cap reduced trading volume by 23%, reduced average losses, and improved traders' returns by about 18 basis points per month, mainly because it stopped the highest-leverage traders from destroying their accounts. It also reduced market makers' profits from retail flow.
See it drawn
Original diagrams for the ideas on this page. Illustrative, not real market data.
What you can use
- When retail forex traders were forced to use less leverage, they lost less money; the leverage was hurting them.
- The traders who used the most leverage were the ones whose performance improved most when it was capped.
- Leverage magnifies the cost of overconfidence; the regulation worked because it limited the damage from bad trades.
Caveats
One social-trading platform, retail spot forex only, around a single regulatory event. Traders on such platforms may not represent all retail forex traders.
Tags: retail, forex, leverage, regulation
Summaries are our own reading of the paper, not the authors' words. Educational only, not advice. Discuss it in Book Club.