Does Net Buying Pressure Affect the Shape of Implied Volatility Functions?
Read the paperopens doi.org in a new tab
What they found
The authors proposed that the volatility smile is shaped partly by supply and demand rather than only by expectations of the return distribution. Using S&P 500 index and individual stock options from 1995 to 2000 with data on whether trades were buyer- or seller-initiated, they showed that daily changes in implied volatility are driven by net buying pressure: heavy buying of index puts raises put implied volatility, and the effect reverses the next day as market makers rebalance. For the index, demand for out-of-the-money puts (portfolio insurance) explains the steep skew; for individual stocks, call demand dominates.
See it drawn
Original diagrams for the ideas on this page. Illustrative, not real market data.
What you can use
- Implied volatility is a price, and like any price it moves with order flow; a rush to buy puts raises put IV independent of any change in risk.
- Market makers with limited capital demand compensation for absorbing one-sided demand, and that is part of what you pay in the skew.
- Because the flow-driven part of IV reverses over days, selling into a demand spike has a short-term edge.
Caveats
Sample 1995 to 2000; classification of trades as buyer- or seller-initiated is approximate. The next-day reversal is small relative to bid-ask spreads for retail.
Tags: options, implied-volatility, order-flow, skew
Summaries are our own reading of the paper, not the authors' words. Educational only, not advice. Discuss it in Book Club.